An Overview of Maxillofacial Trauma

Author
Date Released
Amir Jahromi
21/07/2020

This lesson will provide an overview to maxillofacial trauma, and we will explore some of the principles behind its clinical features and management. Fasten your seatbelt, and get ready for loads of diagrams and new terminology that will come in the next few lessons!

From high impact road traffic accidents to violence, or maybe just a "simple" fall; facial trauma is still a common injury that presents in our accident and emergency departments, and may present first in the dental chair. We must be able to recognised these injuries to make appropriate referrals, gain an understanding of their management and any complications that can occur, ready for when the patient is discharged back into primary care.

Are facial fractures different to fractures elsewhere in the body?

Yes, and there are four key ways in which facial fractures differ from fractures of bone in other parts of the body:

The proximity to the airway

Following a facial bone fracture, the affected bone may displaced in a direction which may compromise the airway. This happens commonly with mandibular fractures, where the tension in the muscles will pull the bone fragments, along with the tongue, posteriorly towards the airway. In maxillary fractures, the maxilla may fall inferiorly due to the fracture, and thus the airway is occluded. Avulsed teeth and/or fragments of teeth may also obstruct the airway. In addition, the loss of muscle tone following injury can lead to risks to the airway (1). Regardless of the cause, any respiratory obstruction caused by a facial fracture must be managed immediately, as a compromised airway could be fatal.

Cervical spine Injury 

These types of injuries can be associated with maxillofacial trauma (2), as the forces exerted on the facial bones can be transmitted through to the cervical spine. More importantly, cervical spine injuries must be ruled out when any injuries to the head occur, due to their high potential for mortality and neurologic morbidity (3).

Teeth 

You don’t find teeth on any other bones in the body! As we mentioned in the previous lesson, bones need to be brought into close apposition, to allow for primary healing to take place. Teeth can help in identifying the exact position in which the fragments need to be placed, allowing the fractured bone to retain the correct anatomical shape after healing. Furthermore, the presence of teeth on the maxilla and mandible will help with achieving stabilisation of the fracture. This means, that not only will the bones stay in place, the occlusion can be checked as the fractured bone is stabilised.

On the flip-side, teeth involved with the fracture may need to be extracted, for example: if they are infected (apical periodontitis), as there is a risk that the infection in the tooth may induce an infection in the fracture. This will be covered later in this lesson.

Blood supply 

The facial bones have an excellent blood supply, and going through bone healing in the previous lesson should have highlighted how important this is. The facial bones have a proportionally large amount of cancellous bone. It is this cancellous bone which houses a complex network of blood vessels, where the vasculature is intertwined through many connections, called ‘anastomoses’. This system of anastomosing vessels is designed to deliver a rich blood supply, and so if there is more cancellous bone (which is highly vascular), the blood supply is vastly improved. It should be noted that the mandible has more compact bone and less cancellous bone when compared to other facial bones, thus its blood supply is reduced.


How are maxillofacial injuries evaluated?

General presenting features of these types of injuries include pain, swelling, loss of function, malocclusion and/or altered sensation. This means that patients who have experienced some form of maxillofacial trauma may be driven by any of these symptoms to be seen.

Furthermore, an incident of maxillofacial trauma may be accompanied by life threatening injuries to the head and/or cervical spine (4), which can impact on the patient’s level of consciousness. A study has shown that patients suffering from maxillofacial fractures are more likely to experience intracranial haemorrhage than those who have not (5).

Another study demonstrated that nearly one-in-five patients with maxillofacial trauma had experienced a closed head injury (6). These types of injuries must be ruled out during the assessment phase of management, to ensure that they are not missed when delivering immediate treatment. In addition to this, there may be other pressing conditions that must be examined urgently, which will be covered now:


Immediate emergency assessment - ABCDE

When a patient attends the A&E department in the hospital, the preliminary treatment that the team carries out is vital to the success of subsequent treatment of the injury. More importantly, the wellbeing of the injured patient is improved. Patients with maxillofacial trauma may present in a critical condition; therefore, it is imperative to follow a strict system to ensure that everything is stabilised. The Advanced Trauma and Life Support (ATLS) algorithm will often be adopted when assessing patients with life threatening conditions.

This system involves assessing five areas; airway, breathing, circulation and haemorrhage control, dysfunction of the central nervous system and exposure. Along with the ABCDE approach, vitals such as respiratory and heart rates, and blood pressure, all must be monitored and recorded regularly. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) chart system is designed to help identify any deterioration in vitals and dictate what is needed next for the patient to be stabilised. In addition to monitoring vitals, the assessment of the patient's alertness is measured: Alert, Voice (respond to command), Pain (respond to painful stimulus), Unresponsive (AVPU) Note: you don't want to be in the PU.

A

Earlier in this lesson, we gave some examples as to why maxillofacial trauma can lead to risks to the airway. The first key thing to note is that a patent AIRWAY is established and maintained, and the lungs must be well-ventilated. Maxillofacial injuries will often involve bones which contribute towards the oral cavity, and so if they are subject to trauma, the airway may become compromised.

B

Following on from this, BREATHING must be maintained too, as this can also be complicated by maxillofacial trauma. 

C

Apart from the airway being compromised from such injuries, patients presenting with maxillofacial trauma may have severe injuries elsewhere in the body too, which may lead to HAEMORRHAGE. Haemorrhage rarely occurs solely due to maxillofacial trauma, but massive bleeding will require immediate intervention if it is present. Risk of acute haemorrhage is more likely to occur if the maxillary artery or pterygoid venous plexus of the facial region and the carotid a. and jugular v. in the region of the neck.

Bleeding can be managed immediately through the use of pressure dressings and wound packing. Clamping the ruptured blood vessels will also assist in controlling the haemorrhage.

D

This area of the assessment focuses on the DISABILITY (medical history) and neurological status of the patient. A systematic approach through the use of the Glasgow COMA scale (GCS) helps to score the patient’s consciousness levels, which in turn will dictate the next steps in the management of the patient. The cervical spine would also be assessed by palpation and radiographic series.

E

A complete examination of the patient, done by EXPOSING the skin of the patient. This may help reveal more signs to build the picture and show the extent of the injuries due to the accident.

Other areas which are covered in the immediate management include shock management and resuscitation, if needed. Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infection of the fracture site and pain relief can also be provided. It is vital to remember that the examination and treatment of the maxillofacial fracture will often take place after more pressing issues such as respiratory obstruction and cardiac arrest. Temporary immobilisation of the suspected fracture can be considered only if it is required and once everything else has been managed appropriately. 


The story

A complete history of the injury is crucial. Important questions need to be answered here; however, in some cases the patient may not have the capacity to answer, due to an impairment in consciousness. In this case, witnesses or those accompanying the patient will need to help build the picture.

The what, when, where, who, how...

  • Did the patient lose consciousness? 
  • When did the injury occur? 
  • How did the injury occur? It is vital that we find out the nature of the accident, such as the type of object(s) contacted, the direction of the impact, the degree of force (energy), the point of impact, the type of force etc.  All of these questions will help gain an idea of what has happened and what type of injury we are likely to find.
    • The type of force that caused the injury can influence the nature of the fracture. A blunt-force trauma to the eye, such as a tennis ball contacting the eye, can cause an orbital blowout fracture. Trauma caused by a sharp object will usually lead to a sharp-force trauma e.g. incised wound.
    • It is also important to enquire about the material of the object that created the wound, risk of infection or left over debris (glass).
  • What are the associated symptoms the patient is experiencing?
    • Some key things to find out here are if there have been changes to vision, ability to breathe, occlusion etc. These will all provide clues as to what the nature of the injury is.
  • Medical History? A detailed assessment includes taking a list of medications, allergies, medical conditions, tetanus immunisation and record and of any previous surgeries. (not exhaustive)
  • Social History? Is there a safeguarding concern? does the patients lifestyle have any effects on the treatment do be provided e.g. malnourished, dictions (alcohol, drugs)
    • Note: has the patient come in intoxicated? will this affect the initial assessment/ may mask potential symptoms. In addition, this patient may be more prone to vomiting, and if immobilised and high risk of aspirating.

Examination

Examination of the fracture should only be conducted once the cardiopulmonary and neurological status has been assessed. If this has been carried out and all is deemed satisfactory, then a more detailed examination of the facial bones, using a systematic approach can occur.

Note: below is a generalised list and so to avoid repetition, site specific examinations will be covered in more detail in their appropriate lessons.

  • Soft tissue injuries:
    • Abrasions - (a graze) a minor wound in which the surface of the skin or mucous membrane is worn away by rubbing or scraping. (note: dental - wearing of teeth e.g. over brushing)
    • Lacerations - A tear in the flesh caused by a blunt object producing a wound with irregular edges e.g. gun shot = high velocity blunt object
    • Incision - Sharp object
    • Wound margins - well defined/ clean cut edges, serrated, rounded or necrotic?
    • Size - use a ruler
    • Depth - Dermal, fat or muscle or deep to bone?
    • Skin tension - in the orientation of tension lines is favourable
  • Bruise - (Ecchymoses/ Contusion) an area of discoloured skin caused by escape of blood from ruptured underlying vessels following injury. Red/ Pink - Bluish - greenish - yellow as the haemoglobin in the tissues breaks down chemically and absorbed.
    • Location - mastoid (Battle sign), Bilateral peri-orbital (Racoon or panda eyes), inner canthus, lower boarder of the mandible.
    • Haematomas - a (solid) swelling of usually clotted blood within the tissues caused by a break in a vessel wall.
    • Ear - "Cauliflowering" and any associated Bleeding/ CSF otorrhoea from the external auditory meatus (EAM). Note: CSF can also leak from the nasal area as well.
  • Contusions - 1/ Bruise 2/ any of various degrees of bruising of the brain (cerebral contusion) *head injury.
  • Swelling - palpate (note: parapharyngeal and the airway)
  • Visible deformation - e.g flattened malar region or zygomatic arch deformity, nasal bone deformity, and frontal bone depression. Eye position, pupillary level and intercathal distance change.
  • Abnormal movement – upon extra-oral palpation, you may notice that you can feel mobility between the fragments of the bone where the fracture had occurred. For example, applying firm pressure on both sides of a fracture in the mandible may show some movement, where there wouldn’t be normally.
  • Malocclusion malocclusion is a common feature of facial trauma, and patients will often be able to feel a change in the way they bite their teeth together.
  • Impaired function trismus may occur due to injuries to the muscles of mastication. In addition to this, the movement of the eyes may also be impeded due to maxillofacial trauma. This is commonly seen with middle third facial fractures. Any suspicion of retrobulbar haemorrhage, optic nerve damage and intra-ocular injury should be ruled out.
  • Nerve injury an examination of cranial nerves must also be carried out, as they too may be damaged due to facial trauma. Dysfunction of cranial nerves II and III may lead to reduced visual acuity and pupillary changes, and this may indicate concomitant intracranial trauma. Restrictions in eye movements may also be due to cranial nerve (III, IV, VI) injuries, or due to the eyeball being trapped within the orbit. The facial nerve (VII) should also be examined by assessing the function of the muscles of facial expression. A loss of sensation (anaesthesia) or a tingling feeling (paraesthesia) from sensory nerves can also occur (7,8).
  • Tenderness and pain

Following the extra-oral examination of the facial bones and structures, an intra-oral assessment is also required:

  • Sublingual bruising/ haemotoma (Coleman's sign)
  • Gingival lacerations
  • Palatal bruising
  • Mandibular deformity
  • Missing/ fractured teeth - loss of restoration, note prosthesis e.g. denture. (think airway)
  • and as mentioned above: occlusion.

Note: It can also be useful to record findings with medical photographs for all of the above (medicolegal considerations needed - consent).

Poly-facial-trauma

life treating injuries should be prioritised first and followed by sight threatening injuries. Unstable mandibular fractures alongside lacerations should ideally be dealt with within the first 24hrs of hospital admission. Other facial injuries may be delayed and dependent on the amount of oedema present, note: the surgeon may be able to operate before the oedema is too great. As mentioned a full body assessment may be necessary and any major chest, abdomen, pelvic or limb trauma may need to be prioritised and also delay some of the facial surgery.

Imaging

Imaging will be covered in more detail in the injury specific lessons. Common images taken to assess facial trauma are:

  • Radiographs:
    • Occipital-mental (OM) view
    • Orthopantomogram (OPG)
    • Posterior-anterior (PA) mandible
  • Computed tomography (CT): If the patient is unable to remain upright for the above images. (an effort should be made where possible to obtain the appropriate radiographs). CT is indicated for head trauma (intra-cranial injury)
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): indication example, suspected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak

The role of the GDP in maxillofacial trauma

GDPs may not necessarily treat the injury, they do; however, have adequate training in carrying out a thorough exam before referral. This will include taking a history, assessing (as best as possible) the clinical presentation, and processing an appropriate referral for further investigations and treatment through secondary care. Patients with suspected facial fractures should be direct to the closest A&E unit, and contact should be made with the on-call maxillofacial senior house officer in advance (9). 


What can go wrong with maxillofacial trauma, Pre/ Post- treatment?

Complications can occur due to facial fractures, as well as their management. Some will happen earlier in the patient journey than others, but you may come across some of these complications in general practice, so it’s worth knowing why they occur and what can be done about them. 

Compromised airway

As mentioned previously, there is the risk of a compromised airway, and causes can pre-operative and/or post-operative. Causes for an airway obstruction include the tongue collapsing posteriorly, posterior mandibular displacement, inferior maxillary displacement, trismus, and swelling of the floor of mouth. These can create difficulties in maintaining a patent airway prior to treatment.

These complications can also occur after treatment, hence the use of drains. The patient aspirating loose debris, for example: pieces of tooth, can also compromise the airway; again emphasising on the importance of immediate airway management.

Management of a compromised airway can include correct patient positioning, chin-lift manoeuvre, and airway adjuncts such as nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal tubes(10). Often, the mandible can be manipulated into a more anterior position to allow the tongue to move into a more favourable position. A cricothyroidotomy would be justified for airways which are completely blocked. 

Nerve damage

Fractures of the zygomatic complex and/or orbit are likely to cause compression of the infra-orbital nerve. If this occurs, anaesthesia of the nerve will take place, leading to numbness in the ipsilateral skin of the cheek, lateral nose and upper lip. Mandibular fractures can lead to damage to the inferior alveolar nerve. In both cases, damage could be permanent, and if any resolution was to occur it could take months. 

Infection

The fracture site may become infected due to various reasons, and these can be grouped into trauma- and patient-related risk factors (11). Note:fractures could become infected pre-operatively and/ or post-operatively. Trauma-related risk factors for infection of a fracture include:

  • Comminution(12)
  • Gross displacement(12)
  • Compound fractures(12) – facial fractures are often compound in nature, due to the communication of the fracture into the oral cavity and other anatomical structures, such as the sinuses. Untreated compound fractures, especially in the mandible, are more likely to become infected if there is no intervention (1)
  • Gun-shot injuries– these can often lead to increased bone fragmentation and soft tissue damage, both of which can lead to contamination of the wound (13)
  • Teeth in line with the fracture– infected teeth which have been fractured/ dislocated may need to be removed, as there is a risk that the tooth/ teeth may induce an infection in the fracture site (9). This is something that the patient must be made aware of in the processing of obtaining consent.

Examples of patient-related risk factors for infection are:

  • Virulence of the micro-organism vs host resistance
  • Age– paediatric patients are likely to have immature immune systems, whilst the elderly may have an impaired immune system.
  • Systemic disease– infection of fractures are more likely in patients with AIDS, diabetes, tuberculosis and those who experience drug abuse (14)
  • Oral hygiene and dental condition (12) – this point is more to do with the patients ability to comply with treatment, as a lack of compliance could increase the risk of post-operative infection (15)

Broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis may be indicated. This would be provided to the patient in the hospital setting if deemed appropriate. An emphasis must be on the high level of debridement in the prevention and treatment of infection.

Adverse bony healing

Adverse healing complications often become noticed later, compared to the aforementioned complications. There are local and general factors which may delay healing. Local factors include:

  • Infection– an infection at the fracture site can impair the healing process.
  • Foreign bodies– things such as shattered glass can find their way into the fracture site; removal will be necessary in order to allow healing.
  • Loss of bone– if there isn’t much bone left where the fracture took place, there is a small contact surface for the bones to be brought into close apposition, and therefore bony healing can be impaired.
  • Inadequate reduction– if the fragments of bone are not brought together correctly, or if soft tissue becomes trapped between the fragmented segments, healing can be compromised.
  • Mobility – if the fragments are not fixed appropriately, they will still be able to move and therefore the time in which the fragments are in contact in the same position is less.
  • Poor vascularity– this is usually due to age, and is more common in the elderly. Additionally, irradiation of the head and neck for the treatment of head and neck cancer will reduce the bloody supply in the bone.
  • Co-existing pathology

Systemic factors include old-age, conditions such as diabetes, medications such as steroids and malnutrition. If post-operative instructions are not followed by the patient, poor healing and other complications are more likely to occur. 

Adverse healing can manifest itself in three ways: 

  • Malunion– a malunion is when the fragments have healed in an unsatisfactory position. This is usually due to the misalignment of the segments of the fracture. As we discussed in the previous lesson, the segments of the fracture may need to be brought together, or “reduced,” bringing the segments into close apposition, to allow for adequate primary healing.
  • Delayed union – this is when the healing time of a fracture is prolonged. A delayed union may lead to non-union of the fracture if it isn’t recognised and managed appropriately.
  • Non-union- a non-union describes a situation where no bony healing has taken place, even after treatment. Most cases of non-union are due to infection of the fracture site (1).

If there are any issues with healing, remembering that there are both local and systemic factors will help with decisions on what needs addressing first. The patient may also need multidisciplinary care in order to cope with the potential psychological effects of the trauma, especially if deformity is unavoidable.


Conclusion

Hopefully this lesson has given you an overview of maxillofacial trauma, and you should now have an understanding of the presentation, management and complications of facial fractures. Specific injuries will now be looked at in more detail in the coming lessons.

References

General references

Dimitroulis G, Avery BS. Maxillofacial Injuries: a synopsis of basic principles, diagnosis and management. Wright; 1994

Pigadas N, Oliver R. Common facial fractures: 1. Aetiology and Presentation. Dental Update 2006; 33: 347-356

Pigadas N, Oliver R. Common facial fractures: 2. Management. Dental Update 2006; 33: 413-420

Pigadas N, Oliver R. Common facial fractures: 3. Complications. Dental Update 2006; 33: 470-476

Hupp JR, Ellis III E, Tucker MR. 2014. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 6th ed. Elsevier

In-text references

  1. Pigadas N, Oliver R. Common facial fractures: 3. Complications. Dental Update 2006; 33: 470-476
  2. Roccia F, Cassarino E, Boccaletti R, Stura G. Cervical spine fractures associated with maxillofacial trauma: an 11-year review. J Craniofac Surg. 2007; 18(6): 1259-1263
  3. Haug RH, Wible RT, Likavec MJ, Conforti PJ. Cervical spine fractures and maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991; 49(7): 725-729
  4. Down KE, Boot DA, Gorman DF.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Dec; 24(6): 409-12.
  5. Keenan HT, Brundage SI, Thompson DC, Maier RV, Rivara FP.Arch Surg. 1999 Jan; 134(1): 14-7.
  6. Haug RH, Savage JD, Likavec MJ, Conforti PJ.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Mar; 50(3):218-22.
  7. Poorian B et al. Evaluation of Sensorimotor Nerve Damage in Patients with Maxillofacial Trauma; a Single Center Experience. Bulletin of emergency and trauma.2016: 88-92.
  8. Khan T et al. Peripheral nerve injury in maxillofacial injury. Journal of head and neck physicians and surgeons. 2015
  9. Pigadas N, Oliver R. Common facial fractures: 2. Management. Dental Update 2006; 33: 413-420
  10. Dr JE Ollerton 2007, Adult Trauma Clinical Practice Guidelines, Emergency Airway Management in the Trauma Patient, NSW Institute of Trauma and Injury Management
  11. Abdelfadil E, Salem AS, Mourad SI, Al-Belasy FA. Infected Mandibular Fractures: Risk Factors and Management. Oral Hyg Health(2013)1: 102.
  12. Zachariades N, Papademetriou I. Complications of treatment of mandibular fractures with compression plates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79(2):150-153
  13. Ellis E 3rd, Muniz O, Anand K. Treatment considerations for comminuted mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(8):861-870
  14. Malanchuk VO, Kopchak AV. Risk factors for development of infection in patients with mandibular fractures located in the tooth-bearing area. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35(1):57-62
  15. Stone IE, Dodson TB, Bays RA. Risk factors for infection following operative treatment of mandibular fractures: a multivariate analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91(1):64-68.

Signup to get the latest information on courses, lessons and special premium content.

We won't sell or give your information away to any third party, see our privacy policy here>.

    In partnership with...
    linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram