Direct Restorations - Amalgam

Author
Date Released
Mike
3/5/2020

Amalgam is being phased down and in some countries it has been completed phased out. However, the material is still used throughout the UK. This section will cover the material science, usage and shortfalls of dental amalgams.

Amalgam is an alloy. The metals contained within the material have reactive surfaces, that when come into contact with mercury react to form the material we all love to pack and carve.

There are many constituents within Amalgam, and listed below are some of the more important ones we need to be aware of

  • Silver
  • Tin
  • palladium
  • Indium
  • Zinc
  • Copper

A Little History

Conventional amalgam's shortfalls came down to the zinc content and tin reactions. Zinc is used as an oxygen scavenger but if contaminated with saliva it reacted to form hydrogen and would expand causing restoration/ tooth failure. Tins affinity to mercury produces a highly reactive complex with a high chemical and electrical status, which leads to faster corrosion rates, increased creep and a decrease in the amalgams strength; highly detrimental to the tooth-restoration interface.

The Addition of Copper:

Silver-tin complexes produced relatively non-reactive cores. The addition of copper now produces a copper-tin core, which decreases the amount of the highly reactive tin-mercury content. The Amalgam produced is now a lot less reactive and has improved strength, showing less creep and corrosion. Overall micro-leakage at the restorative interface is reduced.

The way we are taught is with the chemical equation, and a classic MCQ question asks, which phase is the weakest link of Amalgam.

Gamma = Silver-Tin
Gamma 1 = Silver-Mercury
Gamma 2 = Tin-Mercury

Therefore, Copper helps to reduces the amount of Gamma 2. Further improvements can be made to the amalgams strength and its resistance to corrosion by the addition of Palladium. Indium is used to increase wetting, meaning less mercury can be incorporated and reducing the potential vapours. Zinc does still have its roll but used in finite amounts.

Amalgam Types:

Conventional: Low Copper - now superseded

High Copper (Average content around 30% weight)

  • Dispersed: This means the copper particles are dispersed throughout
  • Ternary: This means the silver, tin and copper are one complex.

Alloy Shapes:

  • Lathe: Flat, irregular particles. Usually show faster setting reaction and require extensive packing
  • Spherical: Easier to pack and working time is longer
  • Admix: A mixture of both lathe and spherical particles
Cartoon schematic to emphasis the variation in alloy shape

Material Properties:

Amalgam has proven successful over decades of dentistry. It has a high compressive strength but it is still known as a brittle material, therefore is weakest against tensile forces (being pulled).

Amalgam is prone to micro-leakage, despite the efforts to improve its properties. This is due to having a greater coefficient of thermal expansion and a high diffusivity. The material changes shape more than the surrounding structure. This occurs over a number of years via cyclic/ transient thermal effects. The margins corrode and degrade and the tooth may fracture.

Clinic:

2mm thickness is required to provide adequate strength under areas of load due to the brittleness of the material.

Amalgam has no chemical affinity to the tooth, therefore require macro and micro- mechanical retention. Undercuts are produced with a cavo-surface angle between 70-90o to avoid unsupported enamel and keeps in accordance to the enamel prism arrangement.

When a lock is needed, the isthmus should ideally stay within 1/4 of the tooth width. With increased loss of tooth, flexure of the cusps becomes an issue and increase the likelihood of fracture. Caries when present will dictate the shape.

Distal Caries charted - The box is cut and clears the caries, with appropriate undercut. To aid retention an isthmus is cut as well (locking in the amalgam). This can be unaffected tooth.

Leaching of the material can be useful and seen to be anti-cariogenic; however, over time the degradation weakens the material.

Polishing our amalgams is important to reduce pits in the surface (decreasing corrosion). However, due to the long residual setting time, this should be carried out on a separate appointment. In relation to the delayed set, prepping an amalgam core should also be carried out at a separate appointment, unless using a fast setting material that could show adequate dimensional stability around 10mins.

Titration:
We now use capsules which inside contain the enclosed mercury and alloy constituents. This method helps to keep proportions constant, reduce the risk of mercury spills and decrease vapour.

Ever wondered why the amalgamator sits on tin foil? If we were to spill the capsule, the aluminium reacts with the mercury making it less harmful.

Biocompatibility

Amalgam is commonly associated with:

  • Lichenoid Reactions
  • Galvanic Cell (opposing metal of different constituents)
  • Discolouration: Both to the tooth and the soft tissues, resulting in an Amalgam tattoo

The majority of the adverse effects are due to the corrosive breakdown of the material.

Indications:

  • Amalgam is not as susceptible to moisture
  • Class 1 and class 2 cavities in the non-aesthetic zones
  • Amalgam can also be used as cores in both the root filled and non root treated tooth.
  • Amalgams can be bonded (e.g. with panavia) but large restorations of this sort are rarely used due to the advancement of resin bonded systems.

Contraindications

  • Amalgam should not be used in patients under the age of 15yrs of age.
  • The material use should be avoided in patients who are pregnant.

Conclusion

Amalgam still has its place in modern dentistry making it a key material to know about. The material will sustain occlusal loads but with time, even with the improvements made, will show degradation at the tooth-restorative interface. I hope the above helps and enjoy carving on clinic.

References

These resources were used throughout to help produce this lesson:

Bonsor SJ, Pearson G. A clinical guide to applied dental materials. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012 Dec 5.

Von Fraunhofer JA. Dental materials at a glance. John Wiley & Sons; 2013 May 31.

Signup to get the latest information on courses, lessons and special premium content.

We won't sell or give your information away to any third party, see our privacy policy here>.

    In partnership with...
    linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram